"Permanent Alimony & Maintenance Under Section 25 HMA Even in Void Marriages"

Introduction

Marriage is not just a social and emotional bond but also a legal relationship that carries with it several rights and obligations. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA), governs Hindu marriages in India and lays down the conditions for a valid marriage. However, in certain circumstances, a marriage may be declared void under Section 11 of the Act. A crucial legal question that has often arisen is whether a spouse in a void marriage is still entitled to claim permanent alimony or maintenance under Section 25 of the Act.

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has held that even if a marriage is declared void, the spouse can still seek permanent alimony and maintenance. This judgment ensures that individuals, particularly women, are not left without financial support simply because their marriage has been legally nullified.

​

Background

​

Under the Hindu Marriage Act, certain marriages are automatically considered void. For instance:

• A marriage where one of the spouses already has a living spouse at the time of marriage (bigamy).

• A marriage between close blood relatives prohibited under the law, unless a custom permits it.

When a marriage is void, it means that in the eyes of the law, the marriage never existed. However, the question of financial support for a spouse—especially one who may have been dependent on the other—remains. Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act allows courts to grant permanent alimony and maintenance to a spouse after divorce or annulment. However, it was previously unclear whether this provision extended to marriages that were declared void from the outset.

This Supreme Court judgment has now resolved this issue by confirming that a spouse from a void marriage is still entitled to seek financial support.

​

Key Observations of the Supreme Court

​

1. Interpretation of Section 25

   • The Court interpreted the phrase “any decree” in Section 25 broadly. It ruled that this includes decrees declaring a marriage null and void.

   • This means that even if a marriage is legally considered non-existent, the right to claim maintenance under the Act still stands.

2. Ensuring Financial Protection

   • The judgment highlights that financial dependence does not automatically end just because a marriage is declared void.

   • A spouse who has been financially dependent, especially in cases where they were unaware of the marriage being void (e.g., in cases of bigamy), should not be left without financial support.

3. Application of Interim Maintenance (Section 24 HMA)

   • The Court also addressed the right to interim maintenance during legal proceedings.

   • It ruled that even if a marriage is later found to be void, the spouse can still be granted interim financial support while the case is being heard.

4. Rejection of Derogatory Terminology

   • The Court condemned the use of terms like "illegitimate wife" or "faithful mistress" in legal proceedings, stating that such language is outdated and violates the fundamental right to dignity.

​

Conclusion

​

This ruling by the Supreme Court is a progressive step toward ensuring that legal technicalities do not deprive individuals, particularly vulnerable spouses, of financial support. By extending the scope of Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act to include void marriages, the Court has reinforced the principle that marriage—valid or void—does not absolve a spouse of their financial responsibilities.

This judgment also strengthens the legal rights of women, ensuring they are not left helpless due to circumstances beyond their control. It upholds the fundamental right to dignity and prevents the misuse of legal loopholes to deny financial support. Ultimately, this decision ensures that justice is not limited to the validity of a marriage but extends to the fairness of financial support.